


Signals Blue | Provider of High-quality Crypto Signals March 2023
Based on authentic user experiences
Surfer
6730 reviews
N/A
1 year ago
Avoid
I was a member of the group during September and have made an analysis of all the signals that I received and the outcomes To be fair it was a difficult trading month but that was exactly why I paid for signals to help me make better choices According to their website they had an 84 level of accuracy this month but I don t see how that can be anything other than a plain lie Of 40 signals that I received 15 37 5 were stopped out before reaching any profit targets 11 27 5 reached target 1 before falling to the SL 4 10 reached target 2 4 10 reached target 3 and 6 15 reached target 4 So you may conclude that their accuracy was 62 5 the signals that didn t get stopped out but you also have to keep in mind that targets are often modest and stop losses large meaning the risk reward ratio is terrible and even if you reach target 1 or 2 if you later get stopped out the overall result could be a loss In my experience losses were big and wins are mostly small with there being a run of 11 trades in a row that had an overall negative result In their introductory guide they encourage you to not always put a stop loss because prices may go down then come up again Well that s generally true in a bull market but not putting a stop loss definitely isn t good practice If they send a buy signal then the price falls 20 before eventually perhaps weeks later rising above the entry point again this must be considered a failed trade even if you decide to hang on to it and wait for it to recover The main problem that I have is their dishonesty They don t show their trades and their outcomes for a reason There are other signals groups don t claim such high accuracy but they are at least believable because they are transparent and show records of their trades with their outcomes Choose one of them instead Next don t expect to learn anything Their signals come with no justification or technical analysis so you don t have any basis on which to base a decision to enter a trade or not If you are able to analyse completely on your own whether to enter the trade or not then you don t need a signals group like this anyway The only communication you receive is buy signals and when targets are achieved If the market is crashing and all the trades are turning into losses you won t get any warning or explanation The stop losses also seem to be generated quite randomly not below any support level or with any other technical justification but rather a round below the entry in my experience the stop losses were often around 8 Needless to say I don t think they can justify their high prices I foolishly assumed that the expense combined with their accuracy rates would guarantee higher quality but I was wrong I was also persuaded by all the positive reviews on TrustPilot but I suspect they re mostly fake It s at least suspicious that nobody mentions the problems that were so obvious to me ot goes into a convincing amount of detail I ve also noticed that all their reviews have come in the last few months despite them claiming to have been in operation for years Considering the absolute lack of technical analysis or any other evidence behind their signals I wonder if the success of some of their signals is due to luck During a bull market when prices are generally increasing you can probably choose any decent coin which has been performing well recently use a large stop loss or none have a modest target and more often than not you will probably be successful EDIT IN RESPONSE TO SIGNAL BLUE S COMMENTS I have shared details with Trust Pilot of my subsription and they have verified that I was a genuine customer I don t work for any competitor and even if I did it wouldn t make a difference to my arguments because they are all based on evidence not just badmouthing Lastly my suscription didn t run exactly from Sep 1st to the 30th hence the discrepancy with the number of signals It is possible that the team behind Signals Blue had better results that month than I did but I was following their own signals If they had better ideas than the minimal information in their signals then why don t they communicate it A person pays for a signals service because they want to be fully guided not given just a litle tip and then left to themselves Signals Blue I m not trying to destroy your company but I believe you should make some changes - Share records of your monthly results in order to back up your claims of accuracy Your business will only survive beyond the short-term if people feel they can trust you - Keep in mind that a signals service is aimed at beginners so communicate more and give better guidance - With the above changes and an impressive level of accuracy your high price might be justified Otherwise it s not
Abdulmonem Alharbi
6730 reviews
N/A
1 year ago
worst signal provider due to 50 were achieved the stop loss
before I join to the service I review all the data on their website and it was awesome as they mention most of the targets were closed more than 80 I subscribed to 6 months plan now im at the end of my 3rd month but the issue was most of the signals were in bad judgment by the providers in the good cases was 50 were achieved the stop loss and winning trades only achieved the 3rd target once or twice for October they mention on their website October 2021Total signals 33Closed signals with success 29Closed targets 102Closed signals on stop-loss 4Accuracy 87 88 and September September 2021Total signals 39Closed signals with success 33Closed targets 94Closed signals on stop-loss 6Accuracy 84 62 losing the trades is a part of trading and I m ok if I lost a trade but that s why I joined the service and as I thought its a professional team but after reviewing all the trades and the reviews I m not sure anymore it s a good provider for me this was the worst signal I could ever join for transparency I can provide all the signals and anyone can check them but I know it s not fair for them as this review is enough for me update review they asked for details about what happened Deleted content read update review 3 -------so for the latest 6 signals 1 signal achieved all targets1 signal achieved 1 target and is still open 4 signals achieved stop loss without reaching any targets in summary 66 of signals reached a stop loss without hitting target even Update review 3 first they asked for my details and I provided them later they asked to provide proof trading and signals and I provide it and I also write the latest 6 trades in which 4 of it reached stop-loss without reaching any target one still active and one achieved 2nd target they were angry and send me a private email to delete my review in which contain the details if not removed they will stop my service which I stop using as it was useless plus they replied they have my address include my email IP address and If I don t corporate with them there lawyer will reach to me as it s against the law to write the trade details of them
LJKazuasd
6730 reviews
N/A
1 year ago
Not just that they are not cheap -
Not just that they are not cheap They also provided me a month with a loss Too many stop losses almost every day each signal resulted in a stop loss But the first couple of days looked promising Budget was 1k USD resulted in -155 USDUsing cornix auto trading They also don t negotiate prices They stats don t fit my results with cornix When I ordered I could not believe the 90 win rate they advertise - but I was blind Not sure how they calculate their stats Not recommended this time
FromEZ
6730 reviews
N/A
1 year ago
all statistics and reviews are fake do
Proof is trustpilot verified my invoice they just scammer all statistics and reviews are fake do not try group very bad support and their profit not on ur main balance just enter the trades with 5 balances and got 80 profit that mean 1 profit on monthi can not upload screenshots here sorrynovemberand there is 10 stop loss i upload here what i seen this just scam group they published fake statistics
victor o
6730 reviews
N/A
1 year ago
DO NOT RECOMMEND
A lot of stop-losses was reached acuuracy of signals was not even up to 50th percent for the period of may 9th to June 7th which is different from what was indicated on their official website This was definitely a big waste of 229 99 for the 1 month subscribtionEDIT updated exact price paid and i have receipt to prove i really hope this comment is left up so no one else waste s money on this signal group
Kyle Kaizan
6730 reviews
N/A
1 year ago
NOT PROFITABLE AND FALSE RESULTS
NOT PROFITABLE AND FALSE RESULTSthey falsify their track record if you actually follow their signals you will 100 LOSE MONEYdont believe me subscribe to them for one month and follow their signalsjust looking at their risk to reward ratio is laughablethey have a 1 0 6 risk to reward ratiomeaning you would risk 100USD to make 60USD it makes no sense and has ZERO risk management at all their so called track record is BSstay away from these scammers
Coussement Kristof
6730 reviews
N/A
1 year ago
Quality signals excellent support
Signals Blue provides what they promise providing quality signals with a support desk that is excellent One of the best signal providers on the market Made my transition to a lifetime member today Keep up the good work
David
6730 reviews
N/A
1 year ago
BEST IN THE WORLD 1 SIGNALS CRYPTO 11 10 STAR RATING
I have tested with cryptocurrency specs all the best cryptocurrency signal brands in the world for many years and by far Signals Blue is THE BEST In BEST RANKINGS they are TOP1 To date there is nothing better 100 GUARANTEED BEST ROI automation contact support and everything else Beginners and advanced get help additionally from A to Z so everyone can manage to make really powerful money You can make money during hossa and bessa etc I have exclusive discount codes with best discounts on every package If anyone wants you are welcome you can write to me cryptomasterrrr gmail com
tim christensen
6730 reviews
N/A
1 year ago
Holey buckets
Holey buckets These signals always hit at least target 2 except for that crash on dec 3rd Nobody could have called that