Wikipedia Reviews

A

Alyssa Escalante

2 years ago

Best website to gain knowledge

Best website to gain knowledge on everything

M

Mark A

2 years ago

This is the best encyklopedia out

This is the best encyklopedia out there Lots of easily accesible knowledge

R

Richard Larcade

2 years ago

I know some people who do not find it

I know some people who do not find it reliable but I find it very useful Every so often IK come across something i believe is incorrect and check it on other sites or source material but generally find it is one of the most reliable sites on the internet

T

Trotsky

2 years ago

No business perspectives

Don t bother contributing to Wikipedia You will not get paid Without notice they will delete your post if it links back to your Website on the basis of self promotion even if written in an unbiased tone So what business person would contribute to it It wouldn t make sense It lacks any business perspective It s a total pie in the sky view of everything Go somewhere where you at least know how your being sold to In case you think it is factual anyone can contribute to Wikipedia Anyone and most of it goes unchecked by unpaid time wasters

M

Maria Dallite

2 years ago

They should be ashamed to ask for

They should be ashamed to ask for donations the donations should be made for the people that needs care or help like cancer patients etc and not for a site where they take a lot of money without even working themselves the most surveys are done by citizens free of charge and you suddenly ask to be paid for nothing that you do Shame on you you better close the site anyway it is unnecessary now

A

Alexander

2 years ago

Whatever was is no more Not neutral nor trustworthy anymore

A long time ago you could trust that Wikipedia would provide all sources or angels on all topics or articles You could trust this because it was openly crowdsourced However Wikipedia has now been infected by fanatical extreme posionus users who work in harmony to ruin censor and destory information At current time you cannot rely on that all sources has been noted or that any information has been removed for historical events This is not only tied to recent events but also historical events from hundres of years ago

D

David McMullin

2 years ago

Bias Lies

It s extremely bias reporting lies as fact is criminal Thy will lock the lies so that thy can t be changed or edited If you like freedom of speech are a Patriot in the United States and want to keep our constitution I d avoid and boycott thus company

J

Joel Vargas

2 years ago

They contain a lot of valuable human

They contain a lot of valuable human knowledge but their moderators are biased power hungry folks They keep off notable articles reject good sources and are politically biased It s one of the best concepts in world history marred by petty human ego and greed sadly

F

Floyd Beck

2 years ago

Wikipedia is no longer reliable

Not only has Wikipedia become 101 WOKE and corrupting the truth it is not reliable IF you search Lia Thomas who has been in the news for weeks because the he-she broke all women s swimming records far beyond what 99 9 could ever reach there is ZERO search results at Wikipedia

J

Jim Brannan

2 years ago

Wikipedia is Very bias

Wikipedia is a database that only prints facts that liberals agree with and isn t really a data bank you can completely depend on If it goes against their moral liberal values and and states a fact that they don t like it s treated as not true or it s not put in their database This means this won t be printed if this is run by Wikipedia

Rated 3.63 out of 5 by 112 Happy Customers

Best website to gain knowledge

This is the best encyklopedia out

I know some people who do not find it

No business perspectives

They should be ashamed to ask for

Whatever was is no more Not neutral nor trustworthy anymore

Bias Lies

They contain a lot of valuable human

Wikipedia is no longer reliable

Wikipedia is Very bias

About Wikipedia

Own this business?

Related Companies