Wikipedia Reviews

Very helpful though issue is you sometimes need to double check other websites to make sure that the facts are correct

This review pertains to the English Wikipedia Sometimes there s vandalism but it s often quickly reverted Wikipedia isn t the disinformation pit people still claim it is and articles have citations in them ------------------------------------------------Note Some of the reviews on this page are harmful such as the one from the person who edited a page on their corporation which is discouraged per WP COIEDIT the one that parrots claims of fraud in the 2020 election ironically without any evidence the 1-star review complaining about the Dome of the Rock article not listing it as a mosque - even though it isn t even a mosque - not understanding that the blue lock means only registered accounts 30 d old and with 500 edits can edit the article is used to mitigate that same vandalism everyone complains about the second review complaining about how editing with a conflict of interest on Wikipedia e g promoting your own corporation on Wikipedia is frowned upon the review writing the site off as propaganda without evidence the many ironic reviews claiming the site is all lies you guessed it with no elaboration or evidence to their claims the review writing the George Floyd protests off as left-wing lies and in the same vein all of the other politically motivated reviews claiming that it s all liberal bias the many reviews that don t account for the fact that vandalism is usually reverted quickly the review claiming right-wing bias Admins ban anyone who looks at any pages this isn t how Wikipedia works at all as they can t see who s looking at a page

Had no problems with it I use it to check stuff and its always correct

It is a habit for me to get information from Wikipedia Some content editors is really good and some are just bad But still I think it s the best source for information

Although sometimes you get some weird and not accurate information from wiki you can use it for reference and there are plenty of data on their side about everything and anything

Frequent reader on a huge variety of topics I think Wikipedia has come a long way and is not bad at all in terms of offering a user-friendly fairly accurate experience in knowledge

Many people say that Wikipedia has false information but I have used many of their articles for work and I never get any false information Maybe its just the articles I m reading but Wikipedia seems pretty good to me

Most of my case studies doesn t really promote using wiki but definitely this is the site I go in order to take a glimpse of an overview of a certain topic It has a wide array of insights per specific topic

But it depends by article If you don t dig into politics but nature or science it may give you the right direction But don t expect to learn everything from Wikia you will need more verified source If you are on a trip being hungry and have McDonald s in front of you sometimes it won t ruin your health right Just don t overdo it

The content in Wikipedia cannot be cited as coming from a reliable source It keeps getting edited by any random user All being said Wikipedia org is a good source of information and getting a general idea about the trillions of subjects around the globe