Wikipedia Reviews

A

Apples

2 years ago

The editors on Wikipedia are allowed to

The editors on Wikipedia are allowed to run amok You try and correct wrong out of date information including reference and it is removed almost instantly There appears to be a subversive trend of misinformation Wikipedia is very unreliable use at your own risk Should have warning flash up when you enter the webpage Information that is gleaned from this deplorable organisation is not trustworthy

M

Matteo Di Carlo

2 years ago

Tendentious north americanist and

Tendentious north americanist and atlanticist lies about everything everyone knows this eternally Lies about everything in general it s hard to see an article in which there are not a lot of lies regardless of the topic Some of these articles touch on the ridiculousness including scientific ones they are out of the real world and they are tendentious pre-packaged lies just to make people laugh

A

AG G

2 years ago

Edited by gorilla skeptics

Edited by gorilla skeptics Lead with their American bias not for open discussion and or reference

E

Ed Brey

2 years ago

Filled with unsubstantiated assumptions

For non-controversial topics Wikipedia is pretty good For the big questions about prime reality existence and nature of God age of earth evolution etc Wikipedia pays lip service with articles discussing the topics however in reality it a fails to capture the best arguments and instead sets up straw men and b makes assumptions about the true answer in many other articles It has a goal of a neutral point of view but doesn t come close

N

Nana

2 years ago

Not trusted information

All the information on it came from people who wrote about them self so they can say any thing not true also the information from history came from bad resource which most false and not true they should do research better about about what they writing misleading people not a nice thing to do on website so don t relay on this site at all and go to check another resource better that this one

R

R E Broadley

2 years ago

A great concept but

A great concept but the people trusted to administer the website do not follow their published policies and seem to be ruled by their egos and consider anyone who disagrees with them to be disruptive and therefore to be blocked from the website

D

Dave w

2 years ago

Never take anything printed in wiki as fact

Because this is written and edited by the general public accuracy leaves some thing to be desired unfortunately it can be used to make one believe that something is the truth when it is far from it always do further research to be sure what you are reading is fact

R

Rachel Kr

2 years ago

An amazing human project but

An amazing human project but plagued with terrible bias And on lesser known subjects the quality and trustworthiness of the material precipitously declines Reforms needed to shore up the project

G

Gina

2 years ago

Not A Real Encyclopedia

I have donated in the past but will not be doing so anymore The problem is that the entries are not fact checked and some are not even well written Also very biased towards the Left

M

Mertonn

2 years ago

Once good now increasingly biased

Wikipedia once was and still is for some primarily non political articles a very good resource for getting basic knowledge about certain events and ideas quickly and moderately reliably however it has unfortunately in recent years become overrun by far left propaganda trying to push pro globalist communist cultural Marxist interpretations about recent and historical events e g the Holodomor the 2015 migrant wave Recent US politics etc whilst silencing neutral factual voices

Rated 3.63 out of 5 by 112 Happy Customers

The editors on Wikipedia are allowed to

Tendentious north americanist and

Edited by gorilla skeptics

Filled with unsubstantiated assumptions

Not trusted information

A great concept but

Never take anything printed in wiki as fact

An amazing human project but

Not A Real Encyclopedia

Once good now increasingly biased

About Wikipedia

Own this business?

Related Companies