T
Tom Jensen
Smoke and Mirrors
Updated 23 July 2022 In July 2021 I made a review of this company here on Trustpilot Since then a lot of new things have transpired in the still-ongoing case On 21 June 2022 the owner of the company made a reply to my 9-month-old Google review of the company In said reply an Alex Dagil Co-Founder of Rent Hero among other things made the following statement I m addressing your rather serious allegations here for others reading it we haven t lost any GDPR case and we win 99 of our cases regarding rent-level Allegations is a curious choice of words as it implies opinion rather than fact Fact is on 14 September 2021 the Danish Data Protection Agency Datatilsynet ruled on a complaint I submitted regarding this company In their decision Datatilsynet expressed criticism of Rent Hero ApS for failing to comply with Article 15 3 of the General Data Protection Regulation in short GDPR The article concerns a registered person s right to insight in what a company has registered about said person The company repeatedly ignored my request for such insight hence the criticism Naturally I have kept a copy of the decision for validation purposes should Alex Dagil decide to once again report my Trustpilot review for defamation and or for not having had any real contact with the company My review of July 2021 is still accessible on here after it underwent verification by Trustpilot As for winning 99 of our cases regarding rent-level On 28 October 2021 the company owner gave the following reply to another 1-star review on Trustpilot We have not been contacted by Forbrugerombudsmanden and there s nothing illegal about our business Well on 12 July 2022 the Danish Forbrugerombudsmand Consumer Ombudsman sent a written Orientation Letter to the company a de facto warning letter In said letter the ombudsman informed the company that according to the Danish Law on legal Guidance including article 2 5 legal advisors are not allowed to take payment as percentage of any dividends including no cure no pay practices but must charge their clients clearly defined hourly fees With reference to the company s repeated claim that they win 99 of their cases the ombudsman informed the company that putting forth false statements about their business is in violation of articles 5 and 6 1 of the Danish marketing law and may result in a fine The ombudsman also wrote that they may open an investigative case on the company if they receive more complaints On 19 July 2022 I received a reply to a request for insight from K benhavns Huslejen vn Copenhagen Rentals Board As per the reply Rent Hero ApS has brought 397 cases to the board of which 246 have been closed Of the 246 cases 1 case was a request for internment by the appeals board into a national court case5 cases were rejected3 cases received shared favor ruling37 cases were ruled in favor of the landlord 49 cases were shelved2 cases were returned for renewed assessment148 cases were ruled in favor of the tenant1 case was ruled partly in favor of the tenant - case resumedNo matter how you twist and turn the figures they do not provide a 99 win rate The company owner s nonsensical and self-serving statement that they count settled cases as wins does not change this According to Article 7 of the Danish Public Administrations Act of 24 February 2020 any person or entity can ask for access to information documents etc concerning the work of public authorities Thus any one person or entity can verify the above by writing the agencies in question i e Datatilsynet Huslejen vnet and Forbrugerombudsmanden The Huslejen vn has also released to me several verdicts on cases brought before them by Rent Hero which give some occasionally quite amusing information In one case Rent Hero ApS request for decision on an AirBnB rental was rejected as was their subsequent appeal In another case the tenant ended up having to pay more money to the landlord because the landlord had charged too little in rent I doubt Rent Hero ApS paid the difference One of the perks of living in Denmark is that you have right to access to a wealth of information You merely need to figure out whom to ask Brief update 14 01 2023 Pertaining to the rebuke that the company has many cases in other cities than Copenhagen I asked a bit around I got the following answers Aalborg Kommune 4 cases 3 in favor of the tenant 1 closed without decision Aarhus Kommune 8 cases 3 closed without decision 2 in favor of the tenant 2 in favor of the landlord 1 in favor of bothOdense Kommune No known casesIt thus stands that even with their special counting procedure their win rate is nowhere near 99